MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-72_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-72_ext.xml
MD5SUM0d4886a23b91e5907172c60ce4c5e313
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark540.521
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints752
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension752
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115093OPTIMUM1 481.214 485.126
toulbar2 2008-06-271115094OPTIMUM1 540.521 542.654
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115091OPTIMUM1 870.55 879.37
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115092OPTIMUM1 1248.44 1281.64
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115090MSAT (TO)1 1583.57 4000.07
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115089MSAT (TO)1 1596.03 4000.05
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115088MSAT (TO)1 3600.03 3683.52
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115087MSAT (TO)1 3600.05 3656.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
5 5 3 4 3 0 0 3 3 5 5 7 1 5 2 6 4 4 6 2 4 1 7 6 1 4 3 7 7 6 1 6 1 3 7 7 0 2 4 2