MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-83_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.1/
normalized-rand-2-40-8-753-100-83_ext.xml
MD5SUM765db604daedb69f46980a6c3c83c3b6
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark292.45
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints753
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension753
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271115078OPTIMUM1 292.45 298.685
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115077OPTIMUM1 436.755 441.518
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115076OPTIMUM1 1882.78 1960.17
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115075OPTIMUM1 2149.31 2195.66
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115074MSAT (TO)1 1592.54 4000.05
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115073MSAT (TO)1 1761.96 4000.08
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115072MSAT (TO)1 3600.05 3643.13
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115071MSAT (TO)1 3600.11 3697.03

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
4 0 2 1 6 5 5 2 7 5 2 1 4 1 1 7 6 7 2 6 7 3 6 6 3 5 0 3 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 7 4 4 1 3