MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-29_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-29_ext.xml
MD5SUM2ff1d0b0e6bdd5eb572e276d708361aa
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark155.54
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1115035OPTIMUM1 155.54 155.552
Sugar v1.13+minisat1115036OPTIMUM1 195.027 195.16
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301115031MSAT (TO)1 3600.08 3660.62
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1115033MSAT (TO)2 1540.16 4000.04
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1115034MSAT (TO)2 1586.37 4000.04
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301115032MSAT (TO)2 3600.04 3631.03
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271115037? (exit code) 17.5593 17.7271
toulbar2 2008-06-271115038? (TO) 3600.05 3682.21

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
145 16 40 147 149 121 159 83 179 175 93 7 51 71 148 161 45 137 145 52 69 152 20 68 179 111 154 16 81 155 130 161 10 175 80 168 49 174 175
142