MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-11_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.9/
normalized-rand-2-40-180-84-900-11_ext.xml
MD5SUMd174f30dff34b2f3c393d12ebce78d94
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark47.4708
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints84
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size180
Number of constraints which are defined in extension84
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114940OPTIMUM1 47.4708 48.0908
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114939OPTIMUM1 65.1521 67.086
toulbar2 2008-06-271114942OPTIMUM1 470.513 471.823
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114935MSAT (TO)1 3600.03 3606.32
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114936MSAT (TO)1 3600.07 3619.03
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114937MSAT (TO)4 1578.89 4000.05
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114938MSAT (TO)4 1603.47 4000.07
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114941? (exit code) 17.6783 17.6938

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
102 139 157 79 152 144 163 133 80 176 128 40 25 133 173 81 130 46 76 69 99 138 157 128 148 41 104 147 49 42 139 12 163 71 169 99 177 141 159
109