MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-27_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-27_ext.xml
MD5SUMeb871acdd36f38c6ca314a2281d59de9
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark278.166
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114499OPTIMUM1 278.166 281.098
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114500OPTIMUM1 353.471 356.507
toulbar2 2008-06-271114502OPTIMUM1 486.919 491.167
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114501OPTIMUM1 512.988 516.915
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114498MSAT (TO)1 1578.48 4000.09
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114497MSAT (TO)1 1588.16 4000.07
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114495MSAT (TO)1 3600.06 3601.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114496MSAT (TO)1 3600.08 3605.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
4 6 11 2 13 12 9 7 11 13 6 14 15 8 12 6 1 9 5 6 14 7 5 15 12 12 14 5 6 8 11 15 9 15 2 11 7 14 8 13