MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-24_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-24_ext.xml
MD5SUMfc9ad1f135834eb048e4bc1b71381aef
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark909.126
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints180
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size25
Number of constraints which are defined in extension180
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114397OPTIMUM1 739.876 744.894
toulbar2 2008-06-271114398OPTIMUM1 909.126 916.909
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114396OPTIMUM1 1907.16 1913.86
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114391MSAT (TO)1 3600.01 3631.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114392MSAT (TO)1 3600.03 3614.22
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114395MSAT (TO)1 3600.14 3628.82
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114393MSAT (TO)2 1580.47 4000.06
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114394MSAT (TO)2 1594.69 4000.06

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
23 4 0 22 18 10 18 13 12 4 11 22 10 0 20 10 3 21 6 4 8 0 18 12 8 13 21 7 10 4 0 24 12 7 0 0 19 7 1 5