MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-93_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-93_ext.xml
MD5SUM1ddb53786e5f2a6d548ae915e1ccf36a
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark99.6139
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints180
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size25
Number of constraints which are defined in extension180
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114379OPTIMUM1 99.6139 101.336
toulbar2 2008-06-271114382OPTIMUM1 297.87 300.439
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114381OPTIMUM1 462.713 476.452
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114380OPTIMUM1 537.37 540.279
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114378MSAT (TO)1 1573.47 4000.04
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114377MSAT (TO)1 1575.5 4000.07
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114376MSAT (TO)1 3600.02 3627.62
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114375MSAT (TO)1 3600.04 3612.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
9 10 3 23 19 5 6 14 12 5 19 13 8 11 11 5 12 14 22 13 12 24 1 22 20 13 15 14 5 19 7 21 8 12 7 23 16 14 0 0