MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-2/
normalized-composed-75-1-2-2_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-2/
normalized-composed-75-1-2-2_ext.xml
MD5SUM874a165e8944ddc8ac479e8631e4854b
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.404938
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints624
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension624
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
toulbar2 2008-06-271114318OPTIMUM2 0.404938 0.410833
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271114317OPTIMUM2 0.871866 0.885408
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1114315OPTIMUM2 4.44232 5.50419
Sugar v1.13+minisat1114316OPTIMUM2 8.81566 9.96961
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1114313OPTIMUM2 260.565 614.083
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1114314MSAT (TO)2 1596.88 4000.03
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301114312MSAT (TO)2 3600.03 3615.32
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301114311MSAT (TO)2 3600.03 3618.62

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
5 2 6 4 0 6 5 0 1 0 0 2 3 1 1 0 4 4 8 0 2 1 0 2 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 4 0 6 0 2 0 6 0 0 9 1 7 0 6 2 1 0 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 3 0 5 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 5
0 1 1 1 0 5 5 1 8 0 6 2 3