MAX-CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-10-20-10/
normalized-rand-10-20-10-5-10000-17_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-10-20-10/
normalized-rand-10-20-10-5-10000-17_ext.xml
MD5SUM64283c6e0cfc7dd65c2ff684d7d20483
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best Number of falsified constraints2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark1256.31
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints5
Maximum constraint arity10
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension5
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerNumber of falsified constraintsCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1109622OPTIMUM2 1256.31 1261.63
Sugar++ v1.13+minisat-inc1109621OPTIMUM2 1397.03 1409.86
AbsconMax 112 pc-d1109620MSAT (TO)3 3600.14 3601.45
AbsconMax 112 pc-w1109619MSAT (TO)3 3600.14 3601.37
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301109618MSAT (TO)4 3600.01 3610.92
Concrete + CSP4J - MCRW Engine 2008-05-301109617MSAT (TO)4 3600.08 3634.22
toulbar2/BTD 2008-06-271109623? (TO) 3600.08 3607.51
toulbar2 2008-06-271109624? (TO) 3600.1 3617.31

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Number of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
5 9 0 9 8 5 7 0 3 9 0 9 7 3 2 6 9 1 6 5