CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/composed-75-1-80/
normalized-composed-75-1-80-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/composed-75-1-80/
normalized-composed-75-1-80-6_ext.xml
MD5SUM16cea02b6452121cc7bbd04833b7b216
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.049992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables83
Number of constraints702
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension702
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131102833UNSAT 0.049992 0.0565869
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271102823UNSAT 0.051991 0.0581861
Mistral-option 1.3141102832UNSAT 0.052991 0.0577831
cpHydra k_401102839UNSAT 0.056991 0.06232
cpHydra k_101102838UNSAT 0.05799 0.0619259
casper zito1102835UNSAT 0.077987 0.0853521
spider 2008-06-141102821UNSAT 0.104983 0.113567
MDG-probe 2008-06-271102822UNSAT 0.160974 0.168368
casper zao1102834UNSAT 0.215966 0.220377
bpsolver 2008-06-271102827UNSAT 0.38994 0.390328
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105437UNSAT 0.628903 0.669807
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261102829UNSAT 0.775881 0.83703
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301102820UNSAT 0.842871 0.894889
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261102828UNSAT 0.947855 0.961803
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1102837UNSAT 0.961852 0.989686
Abscon 112v4 AC1102836UNSAT 0.98085 0.991768
Sugar v1.13+picosat1102825UNSAT 1.3048 1.46819
galac E1102831UNSAT 1.38479 1.39712
Sugar v1.13+minisat1102826UNSAT 1.39179 1.55416
galac M1102830UNSAT 1.40379 1.47389
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131102824UNSAT 2.70159 2.7559
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301102819? (TO) 1800 1811.32
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301102818? (TO) 1800.06 1805.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: