CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-40-19-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-fcd-7_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-40-19-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-fcd-7_ext.xml
MD5SUM9a41dd9b53191791c805019802bafde1
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark10.4414
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints333
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size19
Number of constraints which are defined in extension333
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271101656SAT 10.4414 10.5019
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271101657SAT 10.4714 10.4814
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301101652SAT 13.6759 13.8156
Abscon 112v4 AC1101670SAT 15.9786 16.139
cpHydra k_401101673SAT 22.9025 25.4898
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1101671SAT 24.7062 25.2147
Mistral-option 1.3141101666SAT 33.2709 33.4101
bpsolver 2008-06-271101661SAT 96.2554 96.6563
Mistral-prime 1.3131101667SAT 106.609 107.424
cpHydra k_101101672SAT 110.374 111.518
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301101654SAT 179.968 181.696
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261101663SAT 316.132 317.722
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261101662SAT 317.465 320.506
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106721SAT 350.258 353.612
spider 2008-06-141101655SAT 1053.69 1062.99
Sugar v1.13+picosat1101659SAT 1062.08 1072.97
casper zao1101668SAT 1389.59 1402.04
galac M1101664? (TO) 1800.03 1813.61
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301101653? (TO) 1800.04 1800.82
casper zito1101669? (TO) 1800.06 1805.81
Sugar v1.13+minisat1101660? (TO) 1800.06 1801.12
galac E1101665? (TO) 1800.09 1804.41
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131101658? (TO) 1800.16 1813.79

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
7 12 1 2 2 9 1 11 14 10 6 17 15 2 10 16 6 14 1 5 15 2 18 7 11 9 9 0 11 13 17 7 10 13 7 6 14 11 0 8