CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-26_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-26_ext.xml
MD5SUM266b0038c9d9204fcb6a0f1f108efa1d
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.12298
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints222
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension222
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099786SAT 0.12298 0.133608
Mistral-option 1.3141099796SAT 0.374942 0.377685
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099783SAT 0.710891 0.737779
Abscon 112v4 AC1099800SAT 0.822874 0.846323
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099801SAT 0.895863 0.934493
cpHydra k_101099802SAT 1.02784 1.03211
Mistral-prime 1.3131099797SAT 1.07184 1.08257
cpHydra k_401099803SAT 1.10183 1.11101
bpsolver 2008-06-271099791SAT 1.27881 1.29556
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099787SAT 1.3298 1.32942
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099782SAT 1.47877 1.5189
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099784SAT 2.47062 2.52775
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099792SAT 3.79042 3.81397
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099790SAT 4.11337 4.2699
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099793SAT 4.24935 4.33027
galac E1099795SAT 5.2282 5.35228
spider 2008-06-141099785SAT 5.50116 5.52506
casper zito1099799SAT 6.61899 6.69228
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099789SAT 7.82181 7.9873
galac M1099794SAT 8.81166 8.96097
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099788SAT 9.14761 9.2693
casper zao1099798SAT 9.1866 9.19607
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106664SAT 15.5196 15.6174

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
2 8 6 0 8 14 13 4 5 0 2 8 10 11 9 0 1 14 0 6 5 5 13 0 14 0 0 7 0 5