CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-4_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-4_ext.xml
MD5SUM41a6d3bc463781c7fdb0bcaef49d41f4
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.203968
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints224
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension224
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099633SAT 0.203968 0.215484
cpHydra k_401099649SAT 0.216966 0.220111
Mistral-prime 1.3131099643SAT 0.219965 0.22624
cpHydra k_101099648SAT 0.232964 0.238435
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099632SAT 0.345946 0.353914
Mistral-option 1.3141099642SAT 0.419935 0.427183
bpsolver 2008-06-271099637SAT 0.565913 0.573784
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099628SAT 0.870866 0.91052
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099639SAT 0.972851 0.988236
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099638SAT 0.98285 1.03911
casper zito1099645SAT 1.19082 1.21098
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099630SAT 1.3168 1.3752
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099636SAT 1.42878 1.50351
Abscon 112v4 AC1099646SAT 1.59676 1.62601
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099647SAT 1.61775 1.67881
galac E1099641SAT 2.57361 2.6865
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099635SAT 2.57661 2.75635
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099634SAT 2.87656 2.92781
galac M1099640SAT 4.33134 4.42234
casper zao1099644SAT 5.39918 5.42821
spider 2008-06-141099631SAT 6.28304 6.34143
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106675SAT 6.43402 6.53609
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099629SAT 1135.01 1142.66

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
2 7 3 13 9 9 13 9 4 7 10 8 2 5 2 12 4 6 0 3 1 14 7 5 4 3 5 3 8 9