CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-15_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-15_ext.xml
MD5SUM252d2fbed0bb054850223ec0832679c7
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.177972
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints224
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension224
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131099621SAT 0.177972 0.182287
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099611SAT 0.180972 0.186541
cpHydra k_401099627SAT 0.19197 0.198811
cpHydra k_101099626SAT 0.195969 0.201583
Mistral-option 1.3141099620SAT 0.218966 0.225583
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099610SAT 0.232964 0.238962
spider 2008-06-141099609SAT 0.364944 0.371308
casper zito1099623SAT 0.496923 0.509597
casper zao1099622SAT 0.557914 0.564398
bpsolver 2008-06-271099615SAT 0.602908 0.609691
Abscon 112v4 AC1099624SAT 0.907861 0.942794
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099625SAT 0.919859 0.944491
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099608SAT 1.00685 1.05128
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099616SAT 1.13883 1.20482
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099617SAT 1.21181 1.25294
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099607SAT 1.3438 1.41585
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099606SAT 1.42878 1.4576
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099614SAT 1.67874 1.75871
galac M1099618SAT 2.24566 2.36401
galac E1099619SAT 2.6266 2.687
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106658SAT 2.6466 2.68515
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099613SAT 2.99354 3.14642
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099612SAT 4.63729 4.62148

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
8 0 10 14 5 0 14 3 3 7 2 14 13 6 12 8 1 7 12 9 8 6 5 6 9 2 2 10 3 10