CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-16_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15-fcd/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-fcd-16_ext.xml
MD5SUM8289c20954222e7ab782838241fa2397
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.515921
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints228
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension228
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131099555SAT 0.515921 0.519111
cpHydra k_101099560SAT 0.534917 0.538346
cpHydra k_401099561SAT 0.535918 0.544477
MDG-probe 2008-06-271099544SAT 0.707892 0.719251
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301099540SAT 0.807876 0.840063
Mistral-option 1.3141099554SAT 1.03484 1.04537
bpsolver 2008-06-271099549SAT 1.08683 1.10485
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271099545SAT 1.12483 1.13937
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261099551SAT 2.14367 2.1891
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261099550SAT 2.43163 2.51002
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301099542SAT 2.55561 2.61106
Abscon 112v4 AC1099558SAT 2.6216 2.66788
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1099559SAT 2.80757 2.86462
Sugar v1.13+minisat1099548SAT 6.53301 6.68319
spider 2008-06-141099543SAT 9.44256 9.52493
galac E1099553SAT 13.231 13.4114
galac M1099552SAT 13.5799 13.8143
Sugar v1.13+picosat1099547SAT 22.3196 22.6646
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106659SAT 22.6466 22.8742
casper zito1099557SAT 25.7271 25.8643
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131099546SAT 51.5942 52.1165
casper zao1099556SAT 67.6797 67.9598
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301099541? (TO) 1800.01 1808.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
6 7 0 10 6 7 8 5 10 5 11 5 11 11 11 13 9 0 3 9 4 6 12 8 1 5 6 7 9 4