CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-34_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-30-15/
normalized-rand-2-30-15-306-230-34_ext.xml
MD5SUM02da3247629ee5180390580f76e7ffa1
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.089985
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables30
Number of constraints217
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size15
Number of constraints which are defined in extension217
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098929SAT 0.089985 0.096737
Mistral-option 1.3141098938SAT 0.095985 0.101993
Mistral-prime 1.3131098939SAT 0.099983 0.10776
cpHydra k_101098944SAT 0.107983 0.107317
cpHydra k_401098945SAT 0.116982 0.122181
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098928SAT 0.31995 0.321402
bpsolver 2008-06-271098933SAT 0.611906 0.619488
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098926SAT 0.91586 0.94005
spider 2008-06-141098927SAT 0.969851 0.978834
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098924SAT 1.3138 1.33169
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098935SAT 1.39479 1.40532
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098934SAT 1.49177 1.51754
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098931SAT 1.60176 1.75365
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098932SAT 1.9557 2.10157
galac E1098937SAT 2.40463 2.48035
Abscon 112v4 AC1098942SAT 2.6186 2.65692
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098943SAT 2.74058 2.98878
casper zito1098941SAT 2.90456 2.93629
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098930SAT 5.19821 5.22073
galac M1098936SAT 5.32119 5.45022
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106686SAT 5.51116 5.59443
casper zao1098940SAT 24.6173 24.751
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098925? (TO) 1800.08 1806.32

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
14 11 3 13 5 10 8 11 6 4 14 5 10 7 5 1 4 0 8 13 12 11 6 0 0 5 0 2 13 4