CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-40-19/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-24_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-40-19/
normalized-rand-2-40-19-443-230-24_ext.xml
MD5SUM82e68fa0fd533f7bfa00e75283a1c751
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark53.8678
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints342
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size19
Number of constraints which are defined in extension342
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141098542UNSAT 53.8678 54.0791
MDG-probe 2008-06-271098532UNSAT 57.3873 57.9397
Mistral-prime 1.3131098543UNSAT 57.7172 58.2192
cpHydra k_101098548UNSAT 61.0717 61.2421
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271098533UNSAT 64.2112 64.7612
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1098547UNSAT 138.119 139.396
cpHydra k_401098549UNSAT 138.21 138.565
Abscon 112v4 AC1098546UNSAT 140.245 141.655
bpsolver 2008-06-271098537UNSAT 152.715 153.378
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301098530UNSAT 201.479 203.724
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261098538UNSAT 273.978 276.598
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261098539UNSAT 277.333 279.975
spider 2008-06-141098531UNSAT 1012.63 1016.56
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106731UNSAT 1388.4 1391.6
Sugar v1.13+minisat1098536UNSAT 1608.04 1616.16
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301098529? (TO) 1800.01 1808.92
galac E1098541? (TO) 1800.01 1817.22
casper zito1098545? (TO) 1800.06 1808.91
galac M1098540? (TO) 1800.06 1805.41
Sugar v1.13+picosat1098535? (TO) 1800.06 1805.72
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301098528? (TO) 1800.07 1806.02
casper zao1098544? (TO) 1800.07 1815.01
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131098534? (TO) 1800.16 1804.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: