CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-7_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-7_ext.xml
MD5SUM62591c7ac45dd2ea33dbbfa4d36cbcfc
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark10.1505
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097521UNSAT 10.1505 10.2337
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097520UNSAT 10.7814 10.886
Mistral-option 1.3141097530UNSAT 11.4093 11.4603
Mistral-prime 1.3131097531UNSAT 12.1112 12.2164
bpsolver 2008-06-271097525UNSAT 18.4662 18.6137
cpHydra k_101097536UNSAT 19.671 19.9211
cpHydra k_401097537UNSAT 19.815 20.1421
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097518UNSAT 31.1023 31.2804
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097526UNSAT 37.3543 37.4098
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097527UNSAT 37.5233 37.7371
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097535UNSAT 61.4017 62.0335
Abscon 112v4 AC1097534UNSAT 61.5786 62.1673
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097524UNSAT 132.065 133.147
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107192UNSAT 197.672 198.657
casper zito1097533UNSAT 198.473 199.32
spider 2008-06-141097519UNSAT 216.347 218.225
galac E1097529UNSAT 323.94 326.353
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097523UNSAT 448.671 451.222
casper zao1097532UNSAT 783.628 784.795
galac M1097528UNSAT 799.014 806.527
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097516? (TO) 1800.01 1803.02
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097517? (TO) 1800.03 1811.63
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097522? (TO) 1800.12 1816.87

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: