CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-90_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.35/
normalized-rand-2-40-16-250-350-90_ext.xml
MD5SUMc866bb6a5cbfacfad286a14d732ce0db
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark7.62584
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints250
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension250
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097499UNSAT 7.62584 7.69709
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097498UNSAT 7.9188 7.99232
Mistral-option 1.3141097508UNSAT 8.17776 8.24266
Mistral-prime 1.3131097509UNSAT 8.21375 8.28906
bpsolver 2008-06-271097503UNSAT 10.3274 10.4245
cpHydra k_101097514UNSAT 15.7036 15.9716
cpHydra k_401097515UNSAT 16.0766 16.3523
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097496UNSAT 26.6 26.9041
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097504UNSAT 29.7295 30.0484
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097505UNSAT 29.7475 30.1078
Abscon 112v4 AC1097512UNSAT 30.2754 30.3298
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097513UNSAT 31.9281 32.2744
spider 2008-06-141097497UNSAT 125.827 126.917
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097502UNSAT 139.367 139.556
casper zito1097511UNSAT 185.717 187.344
galac E1097507UNSAT 197.255 199.207
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107194UNSAT 218.422 219.344
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097501UNSAT 319.362 322.581
casper zao1097510UNSAT 448.827 449.808
galac M1097506UNSAT 459.957 461.779
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097495? (TO) 1800.08 1802.93
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097494? (TO) 1800.1 1809.42
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097500? (TO) 1800.13 1809.59

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: