CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-12_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.5/
normalized-rand-2-40-25-180-500-12_ext.xml
MD5SUM36496499a82f2ffc2b91e8d7c40fd560
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark12.856
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints180
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size25
Number of constraints which are defined in extension180
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097411UNSAT 12.856 12.8594
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097410UNSAT 12.857 12.9722
Mistral-option 1.3141097420UNSAT 13.196 13.3288
Mistral-prime 1.3131097421UNSAT 13.5409 13.6586
cpHydra k_101097426UNSAT 20.9728 21.2836
cpHydra k_401097427UNSAT 21.1118 21.4599
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097408UNSAT 38.4102 38.6267
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097416UNSAT 63.8953 64.2219
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097417UNSAT 69.5214 70.1356
bpsolver 2008-06-271097415UNSAT 162.069 163.305
spider 2008-06-141097409UNSAT 170.056 171.533
Abscon 112v4 AC1097424UNSAT 265.058 267.631
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097425UNSAT 267.851 270.419
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097414UNSAT 482.879 484.361
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107197UNSAT 538.328 543.521
casper zito1097423UNSAT 784.198 790.232
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097406? (TO) 1800 1808.52
galac M1097418? (TO) 1800.04 1811.51
galac E1097419? (TO) 1800.04 1803.11
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097413? (TO) 1800.05 1808.22
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097412? (TO) 1800.07 1809.96
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097407? (TO) 1800.09 1812.22
casper zao1097422? (TO) 1800.09 1804.11

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: