CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ehi-85/
normalized-ehi-85-297-96_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ehi-85/
normalized-ehi-85-297-96_ext.xml
MD5SUM198e07a0e64ee1b709e16848dfd5731f
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.113982
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables297
Number of constraints4119
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size7
Number of constraints which are defined in extension4119
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131097157UNSAT 0.113982 0.125404
Mistral-option 1.3141097156UNSAT 0.114982 0.122514
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097147UNSAT 0.118981 0.12345
cpHydra k_401097163UNSAT 0.12898 0.136891
cpHydra k_101097162UNSAT 0.129979 0.136722
bpsolver 2008-06-271097151UNSAT 0.487925 0.499627
casper zito1097159UNSAT 0.618905 0.630411
casper zao1097158UNSAT 0.6549 0.668044
spider 2008-06-141097145UNSAT 0.799878 0.813821
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097152UNSAT 0.968852 0.998351
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097153UNSAT 1.05984 1.1098
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097161UNSAT 1.27181 1.31646
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105484UNSAT 1.62775 1.68963
Abscon 112v4 AC1097160UNSAT 1.77373 1.8273
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097146UNSAT 1.9347 1.95782
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097150UNSAT 2.05369 2.20313
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097149UNSAT 2.50062 2.60531
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097144UNSAT 2.78458 2.84182
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097148UNSAT 3.89641 3.94768
galac M1097154UNSAT 3.98139 4.01112
galac E1097155UNSAT 4.85826 4.92744
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097142? (TO) 1800.03 1801.72
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097143? (TO) 1800.04 1803.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: