CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ehi-85/
normalized-ehi-85-297-27_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ehi-85/
normalized-ehi-85-297-27_ext.xml
MD5SUMbb81bf4027c534fb6b435af8e9e800d5
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.116981
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables297
Number of constraints4120
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size7
Number of constraints which are defined in extension4120
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141097134UNSAT 0.116981 0.122177
Mistral-prime 1.3131097135UNSAT 0.12398 0.130777
cpHydra k_401097141UNSAT 0.12598 0.127249
cpHydra k_101097140UNSAT 0.138978 0.144737
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271097125UNSAT 0.266958 0.278249
bpsolver 2008-06-271097129UNSAT 0.475926 0.482302
casper zito1097137UNSAT 0.564913 0.577272
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261097130UNSAT 0.969851 1.00805
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261097131UNSAT 1.14083 1.20893
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1097139UNSAT 1.26381 1.3037
MDG-probe 2008-06-271097124UNSAT 1.2988 1.3103
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105480UNSAT 1.64475 1.72409
Sugar v1.13+minisat1097128UNSAT 2.04269 2.18119
casper zao1097136UNSAT 2.04969 2.07429
spider 2008-06-141097123UNSAT 2.30565 2.3365
Sugar v1.13+picosat1097127UNSAT 2.69459 2.85394
Abscon 112v4 AC1097138UNSAT 2.88356 2.91944
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301097122UNSAT 3.06653 3.141
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131097126UNSAT 4.05938 3.74303
galac M1097132UNSAT 4.28135 4.38185
galac E1097133UNSAT 4.83726 4.91472
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301097121? (TO) 1800.03 1816.22
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301097120? (TO) 1800.07 1806.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: