CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/tightness0.2/
normalized-rand-2-40-11-414-200-11_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/tightness0.2/
normalized-rand-2-40-11-414-200-11_ext.xml
MD5SUM6e657ff108e5761d4e7470667137953c
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.81012
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables40
Number of constraints414
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size11
Number of constraints which are defined in extension414
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271096530UNSAT 5.81012 5.83215
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271096531UNSAT 5.82611 5.83125
Mistral-prime 1.3131096541UNSAT 6.12107 6.15492
Mistral-option 1.3141096540UNSAT 6.25905 6.3175
bpsolver 2008-06-271096535UNSAT 6.48901 6.55183
cpHydra k_401096547UNSAT 13.136 13.265
cpHydra k_101096546UNSAT 13.8129 13.9974
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1096545UNSAT 20.3059 20.4195
Abscon 112v4 AC1096544UNSAT 21.1608 21.3897
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261096537UNSAT 22.5706 22.7721
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261096536UNSAT 23.4704 23.6986
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301096528UNSAT 24.3333 24.5807
Sugar v1.13+minisat1096534UNSAT 42.7805 43.0431
spider 2008-06-141096529UNSAT 84.7631 85.1132
galac E1096539UNSAT 89.7774 90.6804
casper zito1096543UNSAT 96.8173 97.4056
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107167UNSAT 123.322 124.43
Sugar v1.13+picosat1096533UNSAT 132.127 132.797
galac M1096538UNSAT 164.961 166.575
casper zao1096542UNSAT 189.943 191.592
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131096532UNSAT 576.598 578.771
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301096526? (TO) 1800.03 1808.12
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301096527? (TO) 1800.06 1813.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: