CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ehi-90/
normalized-ehi-90-315-65_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ehi-90/
normalized-ehi-90-315-65_ext.xml
MD5SUMc1d8d1105d949cc0ebd5be4c9f71e3d5
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.11998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables315
Number of constraints4387
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size7
Number of constraints which are defined in extension4387
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141096496UNSAT 0.11998 0.125892
Mistral-prime 1.3131096497UNSAT 0.12198 0.132128
cpHydra k_101096502UNSAT 0.133978 0.14175
cpHydra k_401096503UNSAT 0.135978 0.142092
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271096487UNSAT 0.271957 0.285151
bpsolver 2008-06-271096491UNSAT 0.504922 0.515163
casper zito1096499UNSAT 0.563913 0.570508
casper zao1096498UNSAT 0.642902 0.654007
MDG-probe 2008-06-271096486UNSAT 0.685895 0.689149
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261096493UNSAT 0.952855 1.00758
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261096492UNSAT 0.956853 0.996144
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1096501UNSAT 1.3058 1.35992
spider 2008-06-141096485UNSAT 1.58876 1.60641
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105487UNSAT 1.64575 1.70577
Abscon 112v4 AC1096500UNSAT 1.9867 2.04379
Sugar v1.13+minisat1096490UNSAT 2.14367 2.25114
Sugar v1.13+picosat1096489UNSAT 2.43663 2.57951
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301096484UNSAT 3.20451 3.29262
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131096488UNSAT 3.99439 3.9507
galac M1096494UNSAT 4.28435 4.31833
galac E1096495UNSAT 4.5713 4.60071
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301096483? (TO) 1800 1815.92
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301096482? (TO) 1800.02 1813.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: