CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ehi-90/
normalized-ehi-90-315-71_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ehi-90/
normalized-ehi-90-315-71_ext.xml
MD5SUMb9ff0c20c270a09fed4d78a0ffc574ac
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.12098
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables315
Number of constraints4378
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size7
Number of constraints which are defined in extension4378
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141096430UNSAT 0.12098 0.126726
Mistral-prime 1.3131096431UNSAT 0.138978 0.138421
cpHydra k_401096437UNSAT 0.155976 0.164348
cpHydra k_101096436UNSAT 0.158975 0.165139
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271096421UNSAT 0.324949 0.325373
bpsolver 2008-06-271096425UNSAT 0.501923 0.509636
casper zito1096433UNSAT 0.551915 0.557188
casper zao1096432UNSAT 0.6499 0.658572
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261096427UNSAT 0.882864 0.891993
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261096426UNSAT 0.967852 0.998415
MDG-probe 2008-06-271096420UNSAT 1.12383 1.13446
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1096435UNSAT 1.25881 1.30184
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105488UNSAT 1.58976 1.65669
spider 2008-06-141096419UNSAT 1.61875 1.63437
Sugar v1.13+minisat1096424UNSAT 2.23966 2.32647
Abscon 112v4 AC1096434UNSAT 2.52062 2.55492
Sugar v1.13+picosat1096423UNSAT 2.6106 2.76486
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301096418UNSAT 3.07053 3.14054
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131096422UNSAT 4.20336 4.27128
galac M1096428UNSAT 4.41733 4.49046
galac E1096429UNSAT 4.5923 4.6948
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301096416? (TO) 1800.07 1806.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301096417? (TO) 1800.08 1816.03

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: