CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/os-taillard-7/
normalized-os-taillard-7-95-7.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/os-taillard-7/
normalized-os-taillard-7-95-7.xml
MD5SUMade751c01265e76d9130de5791ec47bc
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.095984
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables49
Number of constraints294
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size403
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension294
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271094314UNSAT 0.095984 0.101286
Mistral-option 1.3141094319UNSAT 0.293955 0.298726
cpHydra k_401094326UNSAT 0.380941 0.38528
cpHydra k_101094325UNSAT 0.382941 0.387806
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271094310UNSAT 0.394939 0.404962
Mistral-prime 1.3131094320UNSAT 0.510922 0.521187
MDG-probe 2008-06-271094309UNSAT 0.736887 0.747576
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261094315UNSAT 0.943856 0.999733
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261094316UNSAT 1.05884 1.11104
Sugar v1.13+minisat1094313UNSAT 1.73773 1.85783
Sugar v1.13+picosat1094312UNSAT 3.33549 3.5048
galac M1094317? (MO) 699.69 706.313
galac E1094318? (MO) 960.31 968.214
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301094307? (TO) 1800.01 1803.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301094306? (TO) 1800.04 1816.22
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301094308? (TO) 1800.05 1807.72
Abscon 112v4 AC1094323? (TO) 1800.08 1815.07
casper zao1094321? (TO) 1800.08 1807.81
casper zito1094322? (TO) 1800.09 1811.41
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106195? (TO) 1800.1 1809.21
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1094324? (TO) 1800.14 1801.54
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131094311? (TO) 1800.16 1804.32

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: