CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/sgb/games/
normalized-games120-8.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/sgb/games/
normalized-games120-8.xml
MD5SUM448cbf5b3d15646a7d0f38074fd4bf5c
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.025996
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables120
Number of constraints638
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension638
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131090336UNSAT 0.025996 0.033979
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271090326UNSAT 0.028995 0.035311
MDG-probe 2008-06-271090325UNSAT 0.028995 0.035602
Mistral-option 1.3141090335UNSAT 0.029994 0.0397799
cpHydra k_101090341UNSAT 0.038993 0.0458579
cpHydra k_401090342UNSAT 0.040993 0.047047
bpsolver 2008-06-271090330UNSAT 0.106982 0.115438
Abscon 112v4 AC1090339UNSAT 0.988848 0.994941
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1090340UNSAT 1.02184 1.05723
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261090332UNSAT 1.02384 1.04553
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261090331UNSAT 1.07184 1.10986
Sugar v1.13+picosat1090328UNSAT 1.56276 1.71185
Sugar v1.13+minisat1090329UNSAT 1.60476 1.74891
galac M1090333UNSAT 3.85641 3.95018
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105768UNSAT 4.24335 4.34304
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131090327UNSAT 4.48632 4.52377
galac E1090334UNSAT 5.87411 5.9493
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301090324UNSAT 8.98763 9.08538
casper zao1090337UNSAT 71.2052 71.2825
casper zito1090338UNSAT 79.3589 80.0514
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301090323? (TO) 1800.03 1814.92
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301090322? (TO) 1800.05 1801.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: