CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/sgb/book/
normalized-david-5.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/sgb/book/
normalized-david-5.xml
MD5SUM17c9f521d5bc2f8c73631bda396cab67
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.018996
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables87
Number of constraints406
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension406
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131089979UNSAT 0.018996 0.0264351
casper zito1089981UNSAT 0.019996 0.027493
Mistral-option 1.3141089978UNSAT 0.020996 0.0269799
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089968UNSAT 0.020996 0.0267861
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089969UNSAT 0.020996 0.027049
cpHydra k_401089985UNSAT 0.031994 0.0385859
cpHydra k_101089984UNSAT 0.031994 0.0325541
casper zao1089980UNSAT 0.038993 0.0455489
bpsolver 2008-06-271089973UNSAT 0.078987 0.0867699
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105763UNSAT 0.626904 0.654099
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089975UNSAT 0.896863 0.943185
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089974UNSAT 0.920859 0.942863
Abscon 112v4 AC1089982UNSAT 0.923858 0.944857
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089983UNSAT 0.988849 1.04535
galac M1089976UNSAT 1.00485 1.05339
galac E1089977UNSAT 1.09183 1.12615
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089972UNSAT 1.14082 1.20279
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089967UNSAT 1.16182 1.21797
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089971UNSAT 1.3028 1.41867
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089970UNSAT 2.12868 2.14871
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089965? (TO) 1800.08 1814.52
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089966? (TO) 1800.08 1801.12

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: