CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-25/
normalized-lei450-25c-05.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/leighton/leighton-25/
normalized-lei450-25c-05.xml
MD5SUM44f6ce05738d5a49cbd05931ab1caa74
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.641901
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables450
Number of constraints17343
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension17343
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131089370UNSAT 0.641901 0.64206
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089360UNSAT 0.643901 0.645771
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089359UNSAT 0.644901 0.647394
Mistral-option 1.3141089369UNSAT 0.701893 0.70935
cpHydra k_401089376UNSAT 0.703892 0.716386
cpHydra k_101089375UNSAT 0.710891 0.721353
bpsolver 2008-06-271089364UNSAT 2.20366 2.20346
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105698UNSAT 3.23351 3.27586
Abscon 112v4 AC1089373UNSAT 4.11137 4.1737
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089374UNSAT 4.29935 4.34365
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089363UNSAT 4.6083 4.78677
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089362UNSAT 5.67514 5.53846
galac M1089367UNSAT 6.39603 6.44171
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089366UNSAT 6.67298 6.73281
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089365UNSAT 7.2029 7.31819
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089361UNSAT 7.78981 7.9065
galac E1089368UNSAT 7.97579 8.07247
casper zao1089371UNSAT 49.4915 49.7487
casper zito1089372UNSAT 73.1629 73.7323
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089358UNSAT 111.814 112.391
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089356? (TO) 1800.03 1814.93
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089357? (TO) 1800.09 1801.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: