CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/register/mulsol/
normalized-mulsol-i-1-05.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/register/mulsol/
normalized-mulsol-i-1-05.xml
MD5SUMceabdbc0d5189ac3439aa553c9a48b16
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.141977
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables197
Number of constraints3925
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3925
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089212UNSAT 0.141977 0.148914
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089213UNSAT 0.142978 0.149301
Mistral-option 1.3141089222UNSAT 0.144977 0.151245
Mistral-prime 1.3131089223UNSAT 0.145977 0.150887
cpHydra k_401089229UNSAT 0.155976 0.163324
cpHydra k_101089228UNSAT 0.156976 0.164232
casper zito1089225UNSAT 0.193969 0.201763
casper zao1089224UNSAT 0.361944 0.375544
bpsolver 2008-06-271089217UNSAT 0.509922 0.51647
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105741UNSAT 1.46278 1.5371
Abscon 112v4 AC1089226UNSAT 1.9827 2.03297
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089216UNSAT 2.04969 2.20815
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089227UNSAT 2.06269 2.10182
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089215UNSAT 2.15467 2.28939
galac M1089220UNSAT 2.24966 2.31184
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089219UNSAT 2.39963 2.46421
galac E1089221UNSAT 2.40563 2.45587
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089218UNSAT 2.44063 2.51786
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089211UNSAT 4.96225 5.01988
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089214UNSAT 5.22821 5.30871
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089209? (TO) 1800.03 1809.22
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089210? (TO) 1800.05 1814.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: