CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/register/mulsol/
normalized-mulsol-i-4-30.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/register/mulsol/
normalized-mulsol-i-4-30.xml
MD5SUM47c8dce6ec1bb9945d5eba71f58be254
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.143977
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables185
Number of constraints3946
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size30
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3946
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141089117UNSAT 0.143977 0.151438
Mistral-prime 1.3131089118UNSAT 0.144977 0.151012
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271089108UNSAT 0.145977 0.152749
MDG-probe 2008-06-271089107UNSAT 0.145977 0.153753
cpHydra k_101089123UNSAT 0.155975 0.166353
cpHydra k_401089124UNSAT 0.158974 0.167945
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261089114UNSAT 2.28565 2.30195
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261089113UNSAT 2.6416 2.67307
galac E1089116? (TO) 1800.01 1806.81
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301089104? (TO) 1800.01 1811.92
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301089106? (TO) 1800.04 1801.22
Sugar v1.13+minisat1089111? (TO) 1800.05 1804.33
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105748? (TO) 1800.05 1812.91
galac M1089115? (TO) 1800.06 1810.41
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301089105? (TO) 1800.06 1806.72
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1089122? (TO) 1800.09 1811.76
casper zito1089120? (TO) 1800.09 1803.71
casper zao1089119? (TO) 1800.09 1808.31
bpsolver 2008-06-271089112? (TO) 1800.1 1815.41
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131089109? (TO) 1800.14 1811.52
Sugar v1.13+picosat1089110? (TO) 1800.15 1801.52
Abscon 112v4 AC1089121? (TO) 1800.19 1807.08

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: