CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/register/inithx/
normalized-inithx-i-1-10.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/register/inithx/
normalized-inithx-i-1-10.xml
MD5SUM2f4600fcc9d9d18c52a98a6aedbd8274
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.669897
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables864
Number of constraints18707
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension18707
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271088961UNSAT 0.669897 0.67065
MDG-probe 2008-06-271088960UNSAT 0.671897 0.677029
Mistral-prime 1.3131088971UNSAT 0.678895 0.681347
Mistral-option 1.3141088970UNSAT 0.728889 0.735581
cpHydra k_101088976UNSAT 0.748886 0.760747
cpHydra k_401088977UNSAT 0.752885 0.766546
casper zito1088973UNSAT 1.9837 1.99481
bpsolver 2008-06-271088965UNSAT 2.58461 2.6175
casper zao1088972UNSAT 2.76658 2.77217
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261088967UNSAT 6.88995 6.93912
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261088966UNSAT 7.65783 7.78184
Sugar v1.13+minisat1088964UNSAT 10.4214 10.507
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1088975UNSAT 11.0323 11.1528
Abscon 112v4 AC1088974UNSAT 11.4823 11.6198
Sugar v1.13+picosat1088963UNSAT 38.2302 38.7545
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105733UNSAT 795.334 802.739
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301088959? (TO) 1800.01 1812.42
galac M1088968? (TO) 1800.02 1822.11
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301088957? (TO) 1800.08 1819.53
galac E1088969? (TO) 1800.08 1805.42
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301088958? (TO) 1800.09 1812.82
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131088962? (TO) 1800.15 1808.09

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: