CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/graphColoring/
myciel/normalized-myciel5-4.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/graphColoring/
myciel/normalized-myciel5-4.xml
MD5SUMca197ad8dd9bcd62c32d7f50940a5ec8
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.045992
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables47
Number of constraints236
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension236
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271088373UNSAT 0.045992 0.047681
cpHydra k_401088389UNSAT 0.05899 0.0660271
Mistral-prime 1.3131088383UNSAT 0.05899 0.064894
cpHydra k_101088388UNSAT 0.06099 0.060234
casper zito1088385UNSAT 0.073988 0.0895661
casper zao1088384UNSAT 0.078987 0.0803209
Mistral-option 1.3141088382UNSAT 0.098984 0.105212
MDG-probe 2008-06-271088372UNSAT 0.101983 0.107951
bpsolver 2008-06-271088377UNSAT 0.101984 0.10258
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105717UNSAT 0.484925 0.539381
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261088379UNSAT 0.843871 0.893473
galac M1088380UNSAT 0.906861 0.992864
galac E1088381UNSAT 0.932857 0.964791
Abscon 112v4 AC1088386UNSAT 0.941856 0.993011
Sugar v1.13+minisat1088376UNSAT 0.943856 0.910887
Sugar v1.13+picosat1088375UNSAT 0.988849 1.08123
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1088387UNSAT 0.992848 1.04314
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261088378UNSAT 1.10783 1.15343
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301088371UNSAT 1.14282 1.1974
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131088374UNSAT 2.21066 2.3395
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301088370? (TO) 1800.05 1809.53
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301088369? (TO) 1800.08 1809.22

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: