CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp33/
normalized-fapp33-0650-3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp33/
normalized-fapp33-0650-3.xml
MD5SUM0a9f1ff1ab9407d2449a296e69817edc
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark24.6123
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables650
Number of constraints8684
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size498
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension8684
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Abscon 112v4 AC1086475UNSAT 24.6123 24.679
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1086476UNSAT 24.8132 25.1157
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261086468UNSAT 37.2133 37.6294
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261086467UNSAT 38.2122 38.5631
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271086462UNSAT 45.5081 45.9067
Mistral-prime 1.3131086472UNSAT 49.6464 50.0297
cpHydra k_101086477UNSAT 67.9057 68.4032
cpHydra k_401086478UNSAT 69.7134 70.2807
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301086460UNSAT 133.771 134.501
MDG-probe 2008-06-271086461UNSAT 617.786 620.564
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131086463? 491.717 492.12
galac M1086469? (problem) 0.443932 0.511254
galac E1086470? (problem) 0.450931 0.510727
Sugar v1.13+minisat1086465? (MO) 202.436 206.97
Sugar v1.13+picosat1086464? (MO) 366.05 377.649
Mistral-option 1.3141086471? (TO) 1800.02 1801.12
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301086458? (TO) 1800.03 1803.93
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105588? (TO) 1800.05 1805.51
casper zao1086473? (TO) 1800.06 1815.35
casper zito1086474? (TO) 1800.08 1804.11
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301086459? (TO) 1800.08 1812.12
bpsolver 2008-06-271086466? (TO) 1800.1 1805.62

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: