CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/fapp/fapp34/
normalized-fapp34-0750-0.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/fapp/fapp34/
normalized-fapp34-0750-0.xml
MD5SUM701805f3dd433f8e5a195a0325c2f865
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark25.1672
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables750
Number of constraints8639
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size998
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension8639
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1085699UNSAT 25.1672 25.4232
Abscon 112v4 AC1085698UNSAT 25.2502 25.507
cpHydra k_101085700UNSAT 80.4258 82.0287
cpHydra k_401085701UNSAT 80.9397 82.0684
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301085683UNSAT 134.837 134.903
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301085682UNSAT 264.31 265.639
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301085681UNSAT 279.219 281.714
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105589UNSAT 348.781 351.538
Mistral-prime 1.3131085695UNSAT 667.905 671.472
MDG-probe 2008-06-271085684UNSAT 1564.58 1575.4
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131085686? 0.881865 1.03581
galac E1085693? (problem) 0.410937 0.531731
galac M1085692? (problem) 0.416936 0.509301
Sugar v1.13+minisat1085688? (MO) 241.225 245.658
Sugar v1.13+picosat1085687? (MO) 440.5 527.55
bpsolver 2008-06-271085689? (TO) 1800.05 1805.61
casper zito1085697? (TO) 1800.05 1805.12
Mistral-option 1.3141085694? (TO) 1800.07 1801.22
casper zao1085696? (TO) 1800.09 1802.95
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271085685? (TO) 1800.12 1804.71
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261085690? (TO) 1800.18 1807.63
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261085691? (TO) 1800.24 1816.56

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: