CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford2/
normalized-langford-2-30.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford2/
normalized-langford-2-30.xml
MD5SUM684bd73868b3c19d67d9dc2b2bd45b2f
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables60
Number of constraints1800
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size60
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension1800
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
cpHydra k_101084498? (TO) 1800.01 1807.63
MDG-probe 2008-06-271084482? (TO) 1800.02 1805.01
casper zito1084495? (TO) 1800.02 1814.11
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301084479? (TO) 1800.02 1800.92
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105898? (TO) 1800.04 1806.71
Mistral-prime 1.3131084493? (TO) 1800.05 1807.81
Abscon 112v4 AC1084496? (TO) 1800.06 1814.24
galac E1084491? (TO) 1800.06 1815.51
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261084489? (TO) 1800.06 1816.14
cpHydra k_401084499? (TO) 1800.06 1812.93
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261084488? (TO) 1800.07 1812.26
Sugar v1.13+picosat1084485? (TO) 1800.07 1806.92
Sugar v1.13+minisat1084486? (TO) 1800.08 1801.42
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271084483? (TO) 1800.08 1814.01
Mistral-option 1.3141084492? (TO) 1800.08 1815.51
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301084480? (TO) 1800.09 1812.52
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301084481? (TO) 1800.09 1816.13
galac M1084490? (TO) 1800.09 1813.21
bpsolver 2008-06-271084487? (TO) 1800.1 1815.21
casper zao1084494? (TO) 1800.1 1807.41
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1084497? (TO) 1800.11 1815.65
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131084484? (TO) 1800.16 1803.2

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: