CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/super-os/super-os-taillard-4/
normalized-super-os-taillard-4-8.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/super-os/super-os-taillard-4/
normalized-super-os-taillard-4-8.xml
MD5SUMd5a07a74cfbdb85d600c8aa321718c6a
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.022995
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables32
Number of constraints160
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size214
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension160
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271082764UNSAT 0.022995 0.0303861
Mistral-prime 1.3131082774UNSAT 0.028994 0.0356311
MDG-probe 2008-06-271082763UNSAT 0.028995 0.0340719
cpHydra k_101082779UNSAT 0.030994 0.0387341
cpHydra k_401082780UNSAT 0.032994 0.039478
bpsolver 2008-06-271082768UNSAT 0.067989 0.0762981
casper zito1082776UNSAT 0.481926 0.49577
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107109UNSAT 0.689894 0.654962
casper zao1082775UNSAT 0.764883 0.777304
Sugar v1.13+minisat1082767UNSAT 0.861868 0.967241
Sugar v1.13+picosat1082766UNSAT 1.22381 1.32445
Mistral-option 1.3141082773UNSAT 1.35179 1.36825
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261082770UNSAT 1.47678 1.52419
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1082778UNSAT 1.47777 1.51222
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261082769UNSAT 1.48177 1.5232
Abscon 112v4 AC1082777UNSAT 1.56276 1.57469
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301082762UNSAT 1.9947 1.99294
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131082765UNSAT 15.4047 15.5834
galac M1082771UNSAT 48.2077 48.7377
galac E1082772UNSAT 203.583 205.454
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301082760? (TO) 1800.02 1812.83
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301082761? (TO) 1800.08 1805.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: