CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford3/
normalized-langford-3-3.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford3/
normalized-langford-3-3.xml
MD5SUM299fb69885835c5763c3aa3db583ccc7
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.005998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables9
Number of constraints42
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size9
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension42
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271082007UNSAT 0.005998 0.013917
casper zito1082020UNSAT 0.006998 0.0154399
Mistral-option 1.3141082017UNSAT 0.007998 0.0133179
Mistral-prime 1.3131082018UNSAT 0.007998 0.00767799
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271082008UNSAT 0.007998 0.0135569
casper zao1082019UNSAT 0.011997 0.020629
cpHydra k_401082024UNSAT 0.018996 0.0183159
cpHydra k_101082023UNSAT 0.018997 0.024861
bpsolver 2008-06-271082012UNSAT 0.028994 0.0349
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105913UNSAT 0.309952 0.329757
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301082004UNSAT 0.514921 0.549274
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261082014UNSAT 0.517921 0.572136
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301082006UNSAT 0.521919 0.542998
Sugar v1.13+picosat1082010UNSAT 0.530918 0.612345
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301082005UNSAT 0.541916 0.595214
Sugar v1.13+minisat1082011UNSAT 0.563913 0.652751
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261082013UNSAT 0.612906 0.631738
Abscon 112v4 AC1082021UNSAT 0.675896 0.728855
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1082022UNSAT 0.720889 0.743194
galac M1082015UNSAT 0.91886 0.989859
galac E1082016UNSAT 1.08183 1.20306
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131082009UNSAT 1.27481 1.28389

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: