CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/haystacks/
normalized-haystacks-29.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/haystacks/
normalized-haystacks-29.xml
MD5SUMeebadc79eee5c83f4490f3a0193ddac7
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark32.4861
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables841
Number of constraints11802
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size29
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension11802
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261081951UNSAT 32.4861 32.6666
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1081959UNSAT 33.3889 33.7295
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261081950UNSAT 33.8109 34.227
galac M1081952? (MO) 1637.31 1647.01
cpHydra k_401081961? (TO) 1800.01 1806.03
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105793? (TO) 1800.02 1802.71
Sugar v1.13+minisat1081948? (TO) 1800.02 1803.07
cpHydra k_101081960? (TO) 1800.02 1808.13
MDG-probe 2008-06-271081944? (TO) 1800.03 1805.51
bpsolver 2008-06-271081949? (TO) 1800.04 1812.41
casper zito1081957? (TO) 1800.04 1814.01
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301081941? (TO) 1800.05 1801.02
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301081942? (TO) 1800.06 1817.02
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301081943? (TO) 1800.06 1811.22
Mistral-option 1.3141081954? (TO) 1800.06 1800.72
Mistral-prime 1.3131081955? (TO) 1800.07 1802.82
casper zao1081956? (TO) 1800.07 1809.52
Sugar v1.13+picosat1081947? (TO) 1800.07 1815.83
galac E1081953? (TO) 1800.08 1804.11
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271081945? (TO) 1800.11 1810.41
Abscon 112v4 AC1081958? (TO) 1800.13 1805.36
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131081946? (TO) 1800.14 1808.56

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: