CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/queensKnights/
normalized-queensKnights-100-5-mul.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/queensKnights/
normalized-queensKnights-100-5-mul.xml
MD5SUM368c4b39c2d9adff7fe3e26447d96356
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark30.7603
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables105
Number of constraints5460
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10000
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension5460
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1081381UNSAT 30.7603 31.3087
Sugar v1.13+picosat1081380UNSAT 45.0232 45.636
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131081379? 292.326 293.845
galac E1081386? (TO) 1800 1812.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301081374? (TO) 1800 1816.42
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106574? (TO) 1800.03 1815.42
cpHydra k_101081393? (TO) 1800.04 1823.34
galac M1081385? (TO) 1800.04 1825.42
casper zao1081389? (TO) 1800.04 1815.12
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271081378? (TO) 1800.04 1813.61
Mistral-option 1.3141081387? (TO) 1800.06 1813.51
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261081383? (TO) 1800.07 1802.44
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301081375? (TO) 1800.07 1807.62
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301081376? (TO) 1800.08 1801.22
casper zito1081390? (TO) 1800.09 1815.71
cpHydra k_401081394? (TO) 1800.09 1831.84
bpsolver 2008-06-271081382? (TO) 1800.09 1812.41
Abscon 112v4 AC1081391? (TO) 1800.1 1809.24
MDG-probe 2008-06-271081377? (TO) 1800.11 1812.02
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261081384? (TO) 1800.12 1810.08
Mistral-prime 1.3131081388? (TO) 1800.12 1812.12
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1081392? (TO) 1800.19 1804.58

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: