CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/js-taillard-20-15/
normalized-js-taillard-20-15-95-9.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/js-taillard-20-15/
normalized-js-taillard-20-15-95-9.xml
MD5SUM062c12e95edc5eb24e32ca6160b7df4f
Bench Category2-ARY-INT (binary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables300
Number of constraints3130
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size1314
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension3130
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131080850? 287.704 300.907
galac E1080857? (problem) 59.5869 59.9608
galac M1080856? (problem) 59.6909 60.2896
Sugar v1.13+picosat1080851? (TO) 1800.01 1804.35
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301080847? (TO) 1800.01 1800.73
cpHydra k_101080864? (TO) 1800.01 1827.04
cpHydra k_401080865? (TO) 1800.03 1817.14
casper zao1080860? (TO) 1800.03 1815.51
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271080849? (TO) 1800.03 1812.41
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261080855? (TO) 1800.05 1805.73
Mistral-prime 1.3131080859? (TO) 1800.05 1809.91
Sugar v1.13+minisat1080852? (TO) 1800.06 1813.96
casper zito1080861? (TO) 1800.07 1806.71
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301080846? (TO) 1800.07 1801.42
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1080863? (TO) 1800.07 1800.76
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301080845? (TO) 1800.09 1800.82
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261080854? (TO) 1800.09 1816.94
MDG-probe 2008-06-271080848? (TO) 1800.1 1849.71
bpsolver 2008-06-271080853? (TO) 1800.1 1803.71
Mistral-option 1.3141080858? (TO) 1800.1 1809.21
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105868? (TO) 1800.12 1808.91
Abscon 112v4 AC1080862? (TO) 1800.17 1815.78

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: