CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-8-24-3-2/
normalized-radar-8-24-3-2-32.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-8-24-3-2/
normalized-radar-8-24-3-2-32.xml
MD5SUMc9c6f341263973f32f04d798bb112060
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.035994
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables144
Number of constraints64
Maximum constraint arity16
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension64
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-probe 2008-06-271080449UNSAT 0.035994 0.041244
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271080450UNSAT 0.035994 0.036449
Mistral-option 1.3141080459UNSAT 0.036993 0.044432
Mistral-prime 1.3131080460UNSAT 0.037994 0.0441521
cpHydra k_101080465UNSAT 0.047992 0.0570691
cpHydra k_401080466UNSAT 0.049991 0.0570259
bpsolver 2008-06-271080454UNSAT 0.087986 0.093815
casper zito1080462UNSAT 0.093985 0.100283
casper zao1080461UNSAT 0.790878 0.801964
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261080456UNSAT 0.925858 0.950215
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261080455UNSAT 1.11583 1.18392
Sugar v1.13+picosat1080452UNSAT 1.3078 1.39297
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1080464UNSAT 1.40379 1.47387
Sugar v1.13+minisat1080453UNSAT 1.41678 1.51606
Abscon 112v4 AC1080463UNSAT 1.49877 1.57398
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301080448UNSAT 143.389 144.741
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301080447UNSAT 176.201 176.325
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301080446UNSAT 183.406 185.168
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106603? 0.360944 0.378684
galac E1080458? (problem) 99.9318 100.458
galac M1080457? (problem) 107.409 108.447
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131080451? (TO) 1802.27 1741.83

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: