CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-8-24-3-2/
normalized-radar-8-24-3-2-47.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-8-24-3-2/
normalized-radar-8-24-3-2-47.xml
MD5SUM9f2b1f2a813a54b58c5f088befccb806
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.035994
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables144
Number of constraints64
Maximum constraint arity17
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension64
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131080397UNSAT 0.035994 0.043043
Mistral-option 1.3141080396UNSAT 0.036994 0.0438489
MDG-probe 2008-06-271080386UNSAT 0.036994 0.0441951
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271080387UNSAT 0.037994 0.0487279
cpHydra k_101080402UNSAT 0.048992 0.055598
cpHydra k_401080403UNSAT 0.049991 0.0554431
bpsolver 2008-06-271080391UNSAT 0.085986 0.0933759
casper zito1080399UNSAT 0.101983 0.107578
casper zao1080398UNSAT 0.818875 0.828343
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261080393UNSAT 0.904861 0.946502
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261080392UNSAT 1.00485 1.05791
Sugar v1.13+minisat1080390UNSAT 1.38779 1.48205
Abscon 112v4 AC1080400UNSAT 1.39079 1.4116
Sugar v1.13+picosat1080389UNSAT 1.51477 1.63859
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1080401UNSAT 1.56876 1.62501
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301080384UNSAT 120.602 121.486
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301080385UNSAT 121.471 121.554
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301080383UNSAT 136.097 137.487
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106608? 0.301953 0.322302
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131080388? 659.271 640.14
galac M1080394? (problem) 124.47 125.693
galac E1080395? (problem) 126.269 127.435

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: