CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-20-20/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-1_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-20-20/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-1_ext.xml
MD5SUMfc3ea51f147b1da003c7c6dfcba76e43
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.72113
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints60
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension60
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301080130SAT 5.72113 5.78301
MDG-probe 2008-06-271080135SAT 13.108 13.2153
Mistral-prime 1.3131080146SAT 13.8299 13.9531
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271080136SAT 14.2858 14.2914
Mistral-option 1.3141080145SAT 14.7798 14.8903
mddc-solv 2008-06-091080133SAT 21.1728 21.3612
cpHydra k_101080151SAT 21.6057 21.8873
cpHydra k_401080152SAT 22.0676 22.439
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301080132SAT 36.9254 37.2805
spider 2008-06-141080134SAT 49.1065 49.5453
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106828SAT 99.4269 100.418
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1080150SAT 143.131 144.549
Abscon 112v4 AC1080149SAT 160.426 162.012
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131080137SAT 182.127 182.258
bpsolver 2008-06-271080140SAT 217.933 219.605
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261080142SAT 242.409 244.744
Sugar v1.13+minisat1080139SAT 416.27 418.007
casper zao1080147SAT 924.052 932.461
Sugar v1.13+picosat1080138SAT 1320.7 1326.35
casper zito1080148SAT 1798.63 1804.12
galac M1080143? (TO) 1800.04 1805.12
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261080141? (TO) 1800.05 1810.64
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301080131? (TO) 1800.07 1807.52
galac E1080144? (TO) 1800.09 1813.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
1 18 15 19 13 15 8 9 11 10 11 6 8 0 1 3 10 3 6 0