CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/lexVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-lex-vg6-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/lexVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-lex-vg6-6_ext.xml
MD5SUM80214405512c477cd5eee37a2d95a76d
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.037993
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables36
Number of constraints12
Maximum constraint arity6
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension12
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141079800SAT 0.037993 0.0453041
mddc-solv 2008-06-091079788SAT 0.617905 0.627522
cpHydra k_101079806SAT 1.11483 1.12928
Mistral-prime 1.3131079801SAT 1.11883 1.13605
cpHydra k_401079807SAT 1.12983 1.15666
Abscon 112v4 AC1079804SAT 1.79173 1.82881
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1079805SAT 2.30165 2.35333
MDG-probe 2008-06-271079790SAT 5.45017 5.49881
casper zao1079802SAT 5.75812 5.81371
casper zito1079803SAT 9.54055 10.4633
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271079791SAT 9.90749 9.95201
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261079797SAT 13.062 13.1744
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261079796SAT 16.5425 16.7272
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105996SAT 25.2202 25.4866
galac M1079798SAT 84.7101 85.4064
Sugar v1.13+minisat1079794SAT 168.793 170.492
Sugar v1.13+picosat1079793SAT 265.099 267.511
spider 2008-06-141079789SAT 344.255 346.88
galac E1079799SAT 468.03 468.763
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131079792? 81.9915 81.0673
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301079787? (TO) 1800.03 1819.22
bpsolver 2008-06-271079795? (TO) 1800.05 1805.11
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301079786? (TO) 1800.06 1816.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301079785? (TO) 1800.09 1807.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
3 22 8 6 7 19 22 0 6 13 4 17 8 6 13 14 17 4 6 13 14 12 14 13 7 4 17 14 8 2 19 17 4 13 2 7