CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/lexVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-lex-vg4-8_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/lexVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-lex-vg4-8_ext.xml
MD5SUM3cf2f7a773267fe2a6d5499badb3b938
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark6.00009
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables32
Number of constraints12
Maximum constraint arity8
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension12
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301079534SAT 6.00009 6.09677
Abscon 112v4 AC1079551SAT 7.01993 7.08028
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1079552SAT 8.64968 8.81153
MDG-probe 2008-06-271079537SAT 10.9053 11.008
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271079538SAT 13.4819 13.5908
cpHydra k_101079553SAT 13.9609 14.2514
cpHydra k_401079554SAT 14.0329 15.1324
Mistral-prime 1.3131079548SAT 15.4656 15.5321
mddc-solv 2008-06-091079535SAT 27.0409 27.1572
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105989SAT 31.7012 32.0571
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261079543SAT 43.1014 43.5607
Mistral-option 1.3141079547SAT 52.702 53.1605
casper zao1079549SAT 103.668 104.567
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261079544SAT 156.672 156.852
casper zito1079550SAT 442.774 444.523
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131079539? 89.1145 87.8547
Sugar v1.13+minisat1079541? (TO) 1800.01 1802.03
galac M1079545? (TO) 1800.02 1812.01
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301079532? (TO) 1800.04 1807.42
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301079533? (TO) 1800.04 1800.92
bpsolver 2008-06-271079542? (TO) 1800.09 1807.11
galac E1079546? (TO) 1800.1 1817.01
spider 2008-06-141079536? (TO) 1800.1 1812.91
Sugar v1.13+picosat1079540? (TO) 1800.14 1802.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
17 14 0 3 18 19 4 17 4 18 2 0 15 0 3 4 0 11 8 25 0 17 8 13 12 14 3 4 17 0 19 4