CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-2_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-3-20-20-fcd/
normalized-rand-3-20-20-60-632-fcd-2_ext.xml
MD5SUM00e3e1d55fd87b946e4075a07f4dffab
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark4.5903
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables20
Number of constraints60
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension60
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131077982SAT 4.5903 4.6926
mddc-solv 2008-06-091077978SAT 8.25175 8.80579
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271077981SAT 12.983 13.0978
Mistral-option 1.3141077990SAT 13.295 13.417
Mistral-prime 1.3131077991SAT 13.8799 13.884
MDG-probe 2008-06-271077980SAT 16.3535 16.4935
Sugar v1.13+minisat1077984SAT 16.4695 16.7665
cpHydra k_101077996SAT 21.3817 21.6836
cpHydra k_401077997SAT 23.6144 24.3777
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301077977SAT 24.5493 24.4633
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1077995SAT 49.4735 49.3701
Abscon 112v4 AC1077994SAT 52.849 53.229
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301077975SAT 73.4468 73.3736
spider 2008-06-141077979SAT 96.9113 97.73
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106808SAT 101.22 101.817
Sugar v1.13+picosat1077983SAT 162.007 163.768
casper zao1077992SAT 207.268 207.349
bpsolver 2008-06-271077985SAT 238.736 240.794
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261077987SAT 250.079 252.515
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261077986SAT 361.941 362.053
casper zito1077993SAT 1536.58 1537.39
galac E1077989? (TO) 1800.02 1801.21
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301077976? (TO) 1800.06 1808.82
galac M1077988? (TO) 1800.07 1804.81

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
8 12 0 7 9 10 6 19 7 8 14 6 14 14 14 16 7 19 10 11