CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/aim-100/
normalized-aim-100-6-0-sat-1_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/aim-100/
normalized-aim-100-6-0-sat-1_ext.xml
MD5SUM9401ab0ed7ab0b8710de28732f6c7678
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.015997
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints559
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension559
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271054921SAT 0.015997 0.0232381
Mistral-prime 1.3131054931SAT 0.017997 0.026652
Mistral-option 1.3141054930SAT 0.019996 0.025925
MDG-probe 2008-06-271054920SAT 0.019996 0.025577
casper zao1054932SAT 0.027995 0.036782
cpHydra k_101054936SAT 0.031994 0.0387291
casper zito1054933SAT 0.032994 0.0400299
cpHydra k_401054937SAT 0.032994 0.0382331
spider 2008-06-141054919SAT 0.042992 0.0519809
mddc-solv 2008-06-091054918SAT 0.066989 0.073824
bpsolver 2008-06-271054925SAT 0.110983 0.111221
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105125SAT 0.52292 0.572011
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301054917SAT 0.547916 0.593423
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301054916SAT 0.587909 0.633401
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261054927SAT 0.604907 0.623101
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261054926SAT 0.621905 0.683922
Abscon 112v4 AC1054934SAT 0.964852 1.01365
Sugar v1.13+minisat1054924SAT 0.968852 1.09
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1054935SAT 0.981849 1.01127
Sugar v1.13+picosat1054923SAT 1.05084 1.17679
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131054922SAT 1.07583 1.22411
galac M1054928SAT 1.22181 1.30259
galac E1054929SAT 1.3378 1.46108
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301054915SAT 3.9354 3.99204

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0