CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg5-7_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/ukVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-uk-vg5-7_ext.xml
MD5SUM9f14e81a1bcfdb872b04812888513d78
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.698892
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables35
Number of constraints12
Maximum constraint arity7
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension12
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
mddc-solv 2008-06-091068887SAT 0.698892 0.71055
Abscon 112v4 AC1068903SAT 0.959854 0.991953
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1068904SAT 1.23581 1.30665
cpHydra k_401068906SAT 1.25481 1.25289
cpHydra k_101068905SAT 1.26581 1.27011
Mistral-prime 1.3131068900SAT 1.2928 1.3094
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271068890SAT 2.41363 2.43714
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261068895SAT 5.60915 5.69865
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261068896SAT 9.73752 9.79929
spider 2008-06-141068888SAT 14.9337 14.9607
MDG-probe 2008-06-271068889SAT 18.2622 18.2728
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107338SAT 19.1611 19.3792
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301068886SAT 38.8771 39.2854
Mistral-option 1.3141068899SAT 62.8324 62.8609
casper zito1068902SAT 90.2963 90.3275
casper zao1068901SAT 149.309 150.452
galac E1068898SAT 528.822 533.912
galac M1068897SAT 701.316 708.151
Sugar v1.13+minisat1068893SAT 730.148 735.343
Sugar v1.13+picosat1068892SAT 1049.96 1056.01
bpsolver 2008-06-271068894SAT 1416.94 1427.9
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131068891? (MO) 31.6292 30.8329
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301068884? (TO) 1800.02 1805.92
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301068885? (TO) 1800.07 1804.32

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
12 0 17 18 7 4 18 0 15 0 19 8 19 4 8 13 18 20 11 0 17 18 4 4 15 0 6 4 19 0 18 4 17 4 3