CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/wordsVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-words-vg6-6_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/wordsVg/
normalized-crossword-m1c-words-vg6-6_ext.xml
MD5SUMbbb71dbdbca3acfbea1fe0722b07c9a8
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.328949
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables36
Number of constraints12
Maximum constraint arity6
Maximum domain size26
Number of constraints which are defined in extension12
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
mddc-solv 2008-06-091066659SAT 0.328949 0.331459
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271066662SAT 0.631903 0.639165
Mistral-prime 1.3131066672SAT 0.870867 0.876796
cpHydra k_101066677SAT 0.889864 0.887006
cpHydra k_401066678SAT 0.934857 0.946059
Abscon 112v4 AC1066675SAT 0.983849 1.04917
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1066676SAT 1.15482 1.2012
Mistral-option 1.3141066671SAT 1.20182 1.20195
spider 2008-06-141066660SAT 1.92971 1.94531
casper zito1066674SAT 3.34149 3.36478
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261066668SAT 4.33034 4.37752
MDG-probe 2008-06-271066661SAT 7.36088 7.39562
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261066667SAT 8.5277 8.536
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041107426SAT 14.5578 14.7338
casper zao1066673SAT 15.8756 16.016
galac M1066669SAT 129.62 130.228
galac E1066670SAT 195.146 197.162
Sugar v1.13+picosat1066664SAT 395.396 399.289
Sugar v1.13+minisat1066665SAT 605.979 611.759
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301066658SAT 607.591 609.23
bpsolver 2008-06-271066666SAT 922.487 926.222
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131066663? 78.757 77.9959
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301066656? (TO) 1800.03 1816.02
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301066657? (TO) 1800.1 1808.43

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
13 8 2 4 18 19 8 13 0 13 13 0 2 0 17 21 4 18 4 13 21 8 4 18 18 13 4 4 25 4 19 0 18 18 4 11